Identifying Emergency Department Visits in Medicare Claims Data

Introduction

Emergency department (ED) utilization serves as a foundational metric across health services research. Because ED visits are high-cost and high-intensity, the identification of these events is critical for measurement and evaluation of healthcare quality(1). Health researchers rely heavily on administrative datasets like Medicare claims to do this work. Because there are multiple conceptual frameworks for measuring utilization within administrative datasets, navigating these records requires careful methodological consideration.

Identifying Medicare Advantage and Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries in the Master Beneficiary Summary File

Background

Medicare beneficiaries may enroll in a private managed care plan (Medicare Advantage (MA)) or in Fee-for-Service (FFS) Medicare (Original Medicare). The Master Beneficiary Summary File (MBSF) includes all beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare for at least one day of the year and contains variables that distinguish MA from FFS enrollment(1). Medicare Research Identifiable Files (RIFs) that contain utilization data include only subsets of beneficiaries depending upon how they are enrolled.

The Shape of Professional and Technical Components in CMS FFS Data

What are Professional and Technical Components and Why Do They Matter?

Professional and technical components are HCPCS modifiers that splits Medicare payment into supervision/interpretative and equipment/facility costs. This allows separate entities to bill for their portion of a service. For example, one facility may manage diagnostic testing while a physician or other health care provider handles interpretation(1). This can also apply in situations where an independent diagnostic facility has two different service locations(2).

Identifying Clinical Trials in CMS FFS Claims Data

Can we use the Claims Processing Manual to define service utilization?

The Claims Processing Manual (CPM) is the rulebook for submitting claims to CMS. It covers a wide range of medical coding instructions by clinical setting and form. As the main source of instruction on claims processing and assuming that providers are incentivized to follow submission requirements for reimbursement, it should be a reliable source for defining research methodology.

Identifying Claim Denials in Medicare Fee-for-Service Research Identifiable Files

Background

Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) research identifiable files (RIFs) include both approved and denied claims as well as claims that are denied in part. Claim denials are common, surprisingly complicated, and important for researchers to consider. The choice to include or exclude them could impact study inference(1). Understanding how to identify claims that are denied in whole or in part is key to selecting claims for an analysis.

MBSF: Base Race Code Consistency Over Time (2010 vs 2019)

Can a beneficiary's race change in the MBSF: Base?

The Master Beneficiary Summary File: Base file (MBSF: Base), a research identifiable file offered by CMS, contains two annual race variables: the Beneficiary Race Code and the Research Triangle Institute (RTI) Race Code. There are studies that look at the accuracy of these race variables(1,2), but there is little information about whether the information changes within the data itself.

CMS Encounter Research Identifiable Files – How Are They Different from Fee-For-Service Files?

Encounter Research Identifiable Files: some differences compared to Fee-For-Services

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) collects service-level encounter data from Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) for the purpose of recording diagnoses used for risk adjusted payments to MAOs(2). Unlike a fee-for-service (FFS) claim, an encounter record is not a direct record of payment and not used for billing purposes. Thus, Encounter Research Identifiable Files (RIFs) have some unique aspects to consider: